prplatform

PRP

Large Scale Software Design
COMP.SE.210 spring

Course home

COMP.SE.210 spring /
COMP.SE.210 spring /
Peer-review exercise /
Explain terms peer review

Exercise

Explain terms peer review

0 / 1 peer-reviews completed.

In this exercise you're peer-reviewing other students' submissions to the exercise Explain terms

This exercise was closed on 20.4.2022 12.00

Are terms understood correctly in the submission?
See page submission page in Plussa for context:
https://plus.tuni.fi/comp.se.210/spring-2022/lectures_arch_eval2/arch_eval2_prp-submit/#chapter-exercise-1

Wednesday, 6 April 2022, 08:00 – Wednesday, 20 April 2022, 18:00

Questions

Is quality tree understood correctly?
Peer-reviewed will see this answer*

No.

At least to some degree.

Is scenario understood correctly?
Peer-reviewed will see this answer*

No.

At least to some degree.

Is trade-off point understood correctly?
Peer-reviewed will see this answer*

No.

At least to some degree.

Is force understood correctly?
Peer-reviewed will see this answer*

No.

At least to some degree.

Is software framework understood correctly?
Peer-reviewed will see this answer*

At least to some degree.

Choose one of the terms. What question would you ask about it if you had the chance?
Peer-reviewed will see this answer*

You can make this text area bigger from the bottom-right corner!

You have to enroll to the course in order to submit.
You can enroll from the course page.

Are you really sure?
You cannot make changes to your peer-review after submitting.